Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gary Muffley v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc, et al
as 12-6628
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY W. MUFFLEY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellee:
VOITH INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. 862, AFL-CIO and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Muffley v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00458
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley
Respondent:
Voith Industrial Services, Inc. , United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local Union No. 862, AFL-CIO and United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Amicu:
General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Muffley v. Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC
as 6:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Muffley
Defendant:
Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Gary Muffley, et al v. APL Logistics Warehouse Manage
as 08-6280
Petitioner - Appellee:
GARY W. MUFFLEY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent - Appellant:
APL LOGISTICS WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Gary Muffley, et al v. APL Logistics Warehouse Manage
as 08-5505
Petitioner - Appellee:
GARY W. MUFFLEY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent - Appellant:
APL LOGISTICS WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Muffley et al v. APL Logistics Warehouse Management Services Inc
as 3:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley, Gary W. Muffley, National Labor Relations Board and others
Respondent:
APL Logistics Warehouse Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
