Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Stephens et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02130
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephens and Patricia Stephens
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davenport v. Cooper et al
as 2:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Carlos Davenport
Defendant:
Christopher M. Cooper, Stephen T. Wolfe, Richard Sheward and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Hupp v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hupp
Defendant:
Ability Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Blough et al v. Voisard Manufacturing, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
Randy Blough , Charles Burks , Christopher Caskey and others
Defendant:
Voisard Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Rainier et al v. The Law Offices Of John D. Clunk Co., LPA
as 2:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rainier , Vicki Rainier , Scott Marple and others
Defendant:
The Law Offices Of John D. Clunk Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Georges v. Montgomery Lynch & Associates, Inc..
as 1:2013cv02442
Plaintiff:
Stephen Georges
Defendant:
Montgomery Lynch & Associates, Inc..
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Stephens & Michaels Associates, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02153
Plaintiff:
Eartha Johnson
Defendant:
Stephens & Michaels Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hill v. Homeward Residential, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Hill
Defendant:
Homeward Residential, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Georges v. CBSC, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Stephen Georges
Defendant:
CBSC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stertzbach v. Allstate Processing Group, LLC
as 5:2012cv01957
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stertzbach
Defendant:
Allstate Processing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
