Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Madany, et al v. Shahab, et al.
as 2:2009cv13693
Defendant:
Taquir Ahmed, Muhammad Shahab, Chiradeep Gupta and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ruqiayah Madany, John B. Collins and others
Petitioner:
Frank, Haron, Weiner and Navarro, Keith Wolnewitz, Wolnewitz & Verrelli PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Fharmacy Records, et al v. Salaam Nassar, et al
as 10-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FHARMACY RECORDS, aka Pharmacy Records Production Company, FHARM I PUBLISHING COMPANY and SHELTON RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALAAM NASSAR, CURTIS JACKSON, aka 50 Cent, DEF JAM RECORDING and others
Fharmacy Records, et al v. Earl Simmons, et al
as 10-1354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FHARMACY RECORDS, aka Pharmacy Records Production Company, FHARM I PUBLISHING COMPANY and SHELTON RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALAAM NASSAR, CURTIS JACKSON, aka 50 Cent, DEF JAM RECORDING and others
Defendant:
EARL SIMMONS, aka DMX, DAVID STYLES, aka D.Styles, DARRIN DEAN, aka Dee and others
Fharmacy Records, et al v. Salaam Nassar, et al
as 08-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FHARMACY RECORDS, aka Fharmacy Records Production Company, FHARM I PUBLISHING COMPANY and SHELTON RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALAAM NASSAR, CURTIS JACKSON, aka 50 Cent, DEF JAM RECORDING and others
Defendant:
DARRIN DEAN, aka Dee, RUFF RYDERS and JOHN DOE
Fharmacy Records, et al v. Salaam Nassar, et al
as 08-1607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FHARMACY RECORDS, aka Fharmacy Records Production Company, FHARM I PUBLISHING COMPANY and SHELTON RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALAAM NASSAR, CURTIS JACKSON, aka 50 Cent, DEF JAM RECORDING and others
Defendant:
DARRIN DEAN, aka Dee, RUFF RYDERS and JOHN DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
