Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Heritage Pharmacy, Inc., et al v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC
as 2:2012cv14544
Plaintiff:
Heritage Pharmacy, Inc. and Keith Haddix
Defendant:
Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Gregory Papp
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Keith Haddix
Vizachero v. McAlees et al
as 2:2012cv13985
Plaintiff:
Gregory Vizachero
Defendant:
Joshua McAlees and Capex Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
United States of America v. Pauldo
as 2:2012cv13276
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory Pauldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Peach Properties et al v. Menake et al
as 2:2012cv12509
Defendant:
Daniel Menake, S.I. Housing Development, LLC, Universal Title Clearing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Peach Properties and John Nestel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nestel et al v. Menake et al
as 2:2012cv12511
Plaintiff:
John Nestel and Peach Properties
Defendant:
Daniel Menake, Gregory Moore, Denita Donahoo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gregory v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv15521
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Gregory
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Citibank NA , Bank of America, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mr. Handyman International LLC v. Kruchko et al
as 2:2011cv15264
Defendant:
Gregory Kruchko and Kruchko Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
Mr. Handyman International LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13928
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
