Cases 11 - 20 of 143
In re: Jeffery Carpenter
as 22-5752
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFERY L. CARPENTER
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
ModivCare Solutions, LLCIn re: ModivCare Solutions, LLC
as 21-310
Petitioner:
In re: MODIVCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BRANDEE WHITE, LAURA L. CUNNINGHAM and others
Jeffery Johnson v. Kara Young, et al
as 21-6215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER KARA YOUNG, professionally and personally, LIEUTENANT PENNIGER, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, professionally and personally and others
Jeffery Perry v. Bert Boyd
as 21-5977
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFERY PERRY, aka Jeffrey Perry
Respondent / Appellee:
BERT C. BOYD, Warden, Northeast Correctional Complex
Capen v. Saginaw, County of et al
as 1:2021cv12465
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Capen
Defendant:
Saginaw, County of and Robert V. Belleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jeffery Howard v. Mgmt & Training Corp, et al
as 21-3805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY L. HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION, LORRI SHULER, R. BODEN, Finance Manager et al and others
Greg Adkisson, et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc
as 21-5801
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREG ADKISSON, DONNA ADKISSON, GABRIEL BILLINGSLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Jeffery Cox v. Franklin Cnty Bd of Comm
as 21-3680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY COX
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
