Cases 191 - 200 of 250
In re: In re: Robert Bolt, Sr.
as 11-2662
Movant:
In re: ROBERT DALE BOLT, SR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, SECRETARY OF INTERIOR, MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
White v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2011mc00022
Plaintiff:
Jeff White
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, (f/n/u) Alexander, Madubueze Novozo and others
In re: Paul Blanton
as 11-104
Petitioner:
PAUL ANDRE BLANTON
Respondent:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, DENNIS STRAUB, Deputy Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, CAROL R. HOWES, Warden, Warden, Lakeland Correctional Facility and others
McFarland v. Sumner County Police Department et al
as 3:2011mc00004
Plaintiff:
Philander S. McFarland
Defendant:
Sumner County Police Department, Williamson County Police Department, Davidson County Police Department and others
Lilly v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010mc00125
Plaintiff:
LaQuenza M. Lilly
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Cathy McCarson, David Jenkins and others
Mitchell v. Pollock et al
as 3:2010mc00124
Plaintiff:
Gabble Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Linda Pollock, RMSI Trust Fund Custodian, West Tennessee State Prison Trust Fund Custodian and others
Bowder v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2010mc00018
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bowder
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, CCA/Contractor, SCCF and others
In re: Charles Smile
as 10-2349
Movant:
In re: CHARLES LAMONT SMILES
Respondent:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jamie Middlebrook v. Tennessee Department of Correc, et al
as 10-6162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE MIDDLEBROOK
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of Correction, MARK LUTTRELL CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
In re: Charles L. Smile
as 10-2107
Movant:
In re: CHARLES LAMONT SMILES
Respondent:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
