Cases 21 - 30 of 370
Hamas v. Shiawassee, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11590
Plaintiff:
George Hamas
Defendant:
Shiawassee County, Matthew Stewart, Douglas E. Corwin and others
Duneske v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2023cv11778
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jeremy Jaskulski, Eli Bowers and others
Zloza v. Holland, City of et al
as 2:2023cv11294
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Defendant:
Holland, City of, Michigan, State of, John Doe and others
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Washington v. Michigan, State of, et al.
as 4:2023mc50929
Petitioner:
Lafonza Earl Washington, Sr.
Respondent:
Michigan, State of, Genesee, County of, Office of David S. Leyton and others
Hardy v. Mass Transit Authority et al
as 4:2023cv10447
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Defendant:
Mass Transit Authority, Marie Stewart and John Doe
Simmons v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10087
Plaintiff:
Latausha Simmons
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Louis Swafford, Donald Boone and others
Stallman v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2022cv12635
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Stallman
Defendant:
Oakland County, Darius Zajac, Oakland County Sheriff, present and former yet identified members and others
Kreps et al v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency et al
as 2:2022cv12020
Plaintiff:
Paul Kreps, Diana Boudrie, Zachary Brazil and others
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, Julia Dale, Kimberly Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carman et al v. Alder Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10917
Plaintiff:
Mitzi Carman and Donald Carman
Defendant:
Alder Holdings, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
