Cases 31 - 40 of 4,270
Jorge Melgoza-Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3225
Petitioner:
JORGE HUMBERTO MELGOZA-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Collins et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of et al
as 2:2024cv10655
Plaintiff:
Janaka M Collins and Oladimeji Mubaraq Agbomabiwon
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of, US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, et al v. SEC
as 24-3220
Petitioner:
OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ex rel., RUSSELL MATTHEW COLEMAN, Attorney General and others
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Luis Espinoza-Anguiano v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3219
Petitioner:
LUIS GABRIEL ESPINOZA-ANGUIANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Maria Felipe-Gomez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3214
Petitioner:
MARIA CRISTINA FELIPE-GOMEZ and DENISSE YULEIDI FELIPE-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Nessel v. Shed Horn Cellars LLC
as 1:2024cv10597
Plaintiff:
Attorney General Dana Nessel and Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Shed Horn Cellars LLC
Hasanul Parvaj v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3208
Petitioner:
HASANUL ISLAM PARVAJ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Erlinda Ortiz-Funes, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3196
Petitioner:
ERLINDA ORTIZ-FUNES and CARLOS JAVIER GUZMAN-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jessica Villalobos v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3197
Petitioner:
JESSICA YAMILETH VILLALOBOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Kedin Garcia-Mendez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3189
Petitioner:
KEDIN EDUARDO GARCIA-MENDEZ, LILIAN KARINA RIVERA-RAMIREZ and JOSE EDUARDO GARCIA-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
