Cases 31 - 40 of 225
City of Taylor, TN, et al v. Astec Industries, Inc., et al
as 21-5602
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID C. SILVIOUS, ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., BENJAMIN G. BROCK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CITY OF TAYLOR, TN, GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
In re: KPMG LLP
as 21-505
Petitioner:
In re: KPMG LLP
Respondent:
LEWIS COSBY, ERIC MONTAGUE and MARTIN ZIESMAN, as Co-Trustee for the Carolyn K. Ziesman Revocable Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Alisha Depasquale, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
as 21-3467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAYTON COX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and ALISHA DEPASQUALE
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Eric Kohler v. Cty of Cincinnati, OH, et al
as 21-3466
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR JOHN CRANLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself all others similarly situated and ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS 1-10
Bridal Expressions LLC v. Owners Insurance Company
as 21-3381
Defendant / Appellee:
OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIDAL EXPRESSIONS LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Alicia Arends, et al v. Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc, et al
as 21-3375
Defendant / Appellant:
DAWN SMITH, PROSTAR MANAGEMENT, INC., FAMILY SOLUTIONS OF OHIO, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMAL STEPHENSON, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and MELANIE VILK BARON, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
ALICIA ARENDS, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
April McPeters v. Tony Parker, et al
as 21-5401
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL C. GORE, Tennessee Department of Correction Probation and Parole Division, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID LANE, Correctional Administrator for the East Division of Probation, in his individual and official capacities, ALISHA SHOATES JAMES, Assistant Commissioner for Community Supervision, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APRIL DIANE MCPETERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc, et alIn re: Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc, et al
as 21-303
Petitioner:
PROSTAR MANAGEMENT, INC., In re: FAMILY SOLUTIONS OF OHIO, INC., DAWN SMITH and others
Respondent:
JAMAL STEPHENSON, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and MELANIE VILK BARON, On behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI
as 21-1272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and MYRON W. STAHL, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, KAREN MAKAY, in her individual official capacity as Treasures of Van Buren County and on behalf of a class of all other Treasurers of Michigan Counties similarly situated and VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Deborah Howard, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HICKEY, individually and on behalf of all others situated, BILLIE HICKEY, FLOSSIE BYRD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, CITY OF DETROIT, MI OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR, CITY OF DETROIT, MI OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
