Cases 1 - 10 of 1,923
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
USA v. Frederick Turner, Jr.
as 24-5371
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FREDERICK GLENN TURNER, JR.
USA v. Frederick Owens
as 23-3661
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDERICK T. OWENS
Dobronski v. Sbaiti & Company PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv11591
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Sbaiti & Company PLLC, National Intake Center, LLC, Frederick Michael Branin and others
Tracy Davis v. Robert Willis, et al
as 23-1539
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WILLIS, SCOTT RADLOFF, MONICA KUNZE and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal
Davis v. Willis et al
as 4:2023cv10621
Plaintiff:
Tracy Davis
Defendant:
Robert Willis, Scott Radloff, Monica Kunze and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
