Cases 11 - 20 of 1,324
Desselles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
David Desselles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65633
Plaintiff:
David T. Tucker
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burke v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02422
Plaintiff:
David Burke
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bustamonte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02423
Plaintiff:
David Bustamonte
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delgado v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
David E Delgado
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dexter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
David Allen Dexter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02121
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Laughman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02062
Plaintiff:
David Laughman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horning v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65385
Plaintiff:
David G. Horning
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Danas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
David Danas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
