Cases 31 - 40 of 1,454
Farro v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65482
Plaintiff:
William J Farro
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kyse v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02327
Plaintiff:
William V Kyse
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lipscomb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff:
William Lipscomb
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02247
Plaintiff:
Ebony K. Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smart v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
William Smart
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCracken v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
William McCracken
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonsalves v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
William Gonsalves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01831
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
