Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 20,038
Conley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02888
Plaintiff: Gerald Conley
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02893
Plaintiff: Samuel Jones
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bostic v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02896
Plaintiff: Ryan Bostic
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reifschneider v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02903
Plaintiff: Steven Reifschneider
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff: Andrew Griffin
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ratcliff v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02908
Plaintiff: Michael Ratcliff
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McPherson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02891
Plaintiff: Tracy L McPherson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brauchle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02892
Plaintiff: Laurie J Brauchle
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jaimieson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02897
Plaintiff: Richard Jaimieson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aguilar v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02906
Plaintiff: Lori A. Aguilar
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?