Cases 1 - 10 of 1,565
Odubhraic v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03342
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odubhraic
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Lashelle Allen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
Raymond Noel
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavigliano et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03239
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cavigliano and Estate of Theresa Cavigliano
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kirkman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03197
Plaintiff:
Ted Kirkman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bolton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Gordon Bolton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sayers v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sayers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C R Bard Inc, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Momon, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02610
Plaintiff:
Michael Momon, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024oe02452
Plaintiff:
Downing Albert Patrick
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Powell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02450
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
