Cases 1 - 10 of 329
Vasiloff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Plaintiff:
Sr. George Vasiloff
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franko v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff:
George Franko
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harbison v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65139
Plaintiff:
George Harbison
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
George Rogers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Altamirano et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Stacey Altamirano and George Altamirano
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delong v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
George Delong
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
George Johnston
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diombele v. City of Toledo et al.
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Oumar Diombele
Defendant:
City of Toledo, George Kral and Dustin Kindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Garcia v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04118
Plaintiff:
George Garcia
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eames v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03106
Plaintiff:
George Eames
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
