Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Stover v. Fidelity Investments
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
GERTRUDE E STOVER
Defendant:
FIDLEITY INVESTMENTS and Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Bedzyk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv02436
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc., Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Retirement Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bedzyk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Harvill et al v. Cincinnati Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00901
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Harvill and Raymond W. George
Defendant:
Cincinnati Financial Corporation , Cincinnati Insurance Company , Fidelity Investments and others
Cross_claimant:
Fidelity Investments , Cincinnati Insurance Company and Cincinnati Financial Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Than Thanh Chau
Counter_claimant:
Fidelity Investments , Cincinnati Insurance Company and Cincinnati Financial Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Raymond W. George and Susan M. Harvill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Estate of Arthur V. Dowling v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2008cv01655
Plaintiff:
Estate of Arthur V. Dowling
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Linda M. Dowling and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nichols v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00591
Plaintiff:
Carl Nichols and Carl Nichols
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation via their statutory agent: CT Corporation, Fidelity Investments and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arter v. Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01020
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc. and Sprint Nextel Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K. Arter and Kimberly K. Arter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
