Cases 91 - 100 of 798
Hernandez v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01994
Plaintiff:
Angela Hernandez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lucrecia Ajanel-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3348
Petitioner:
LUCRECIA AJANEL-HERNANDEZ and MADELYN LILIANA AJANEL-IXCOY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Juan Hernandez-Marroquin
as 22-3341
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ-MARROQUIN, aka Juan Carlos Miguel Ramirez
Ricardo Torres Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3317
Petitioner:
RICARDO TORRES HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2022md03025
In Re:
In Re: Proctor & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation and In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Erik Velasques, Frank Ortega, Matthew Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cruz Hernandez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01696
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cruz Hernandez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosendo Alvarez-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3137
Petitioner:
ROSENDO ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Maria Gregorio-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3116
Petitioner:
MARIA GREGORIO-HERNANDEZ, PEDRO LUCAS-GREGORIO and LUIS LUCAS-GREGORIO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jorge Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3120
Petitioner:
JORGE HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Hernandez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hernandez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
