Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Marks v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Martha Marks
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randolph v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv06636
Plaintiff:
Randall Randolph
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flesher v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv06633
Plaintiff:
Marsha Flesher
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khadra v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv06635
Plaintiff:
Christine Khadra
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torrence v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv06634
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Dan Torrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Somerville v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv06330
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Alex Tyler Somerville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv06035
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Ross
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2020cv04955
Defendant:
The Chemours Company and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Sherman White and Mindy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2020cv02824
Plaintiff:
Darrell Crawford and Edna Crawford
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodge v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv02547
Plaintiff:
Justin Hodge
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
