Cases 41 - 50 of 217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Garcia et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lee Garcia and Fernando Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernando Garcia-Garduno v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3336
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GARCIA-GARDUNO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Fernando Aranda-Avilez v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3129
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ARANDA-AVILEZ
Mirian Zelaya-Martinez, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 20-4311
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
GABRIEL FERNANDO SIERRA-ZELAYA and MIRIAN YAMILETH ZELAYA-MARTINEZ
Emma Soto-Mejia, et al v. William Barr
as 20-4079
Petitioner:
FERNANDO JOSUE ANARIBA-SOTO, JUNIOR JAVIER ANARIBA-SOTO and EMMA YAMILETH SOTO-MEJIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Janet Malam, et al v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 20-1977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AHAMMAD ALI, ZAID SHAHER MOHAMMAD AL ARAJ, TOMAS CARDONA RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WAAD BARASH, JOSE MAURICIO GARCIA TOLEDO, JOHANNA WHERNMAN and others
Respondent:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, CHAD F. WOLF, DHS Secretary, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, ICE Deputy Director and others
Petitioner:
JANET MALAM
Angel Gaytan-Covarrubias v. William Barr
as 20-3945
Petitioner:
ANGEL FERNANDO GAYTAN-COVARRUBIAS, aka Covarrubias-Gaytan, aka Covarubas-Gaytan
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Dechellis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04521
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO DECHELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
