Cases 41 - 45 of 45
Carol Metz, et al v. Unizan Bank, et al
as 09-3751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL METZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIZAN BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ZANESVILLE and COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, FIFTH THIRD BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of STRONGSVILLE SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST UNITED BANK; FIRST UNITED BANCORP; FIRST UNION and others
Carol Metz, et al v. Unizan Bank, et al
as 09-3751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL METZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIZAN BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ZANESVILLE and COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, FIFTH THIRD BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of STRONGSVILLE SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST UNITED BANK; FIRST UNITED BANCORP; FIRST UNION and others
Stephenson v. Digital Angel et al
as 2:2008cv00791
Plaintiff:
William Stephenson
Defendant:
Digital Angel, United Way of Central Ohio, Ohio State University and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephenson v. Ohio State University et al
as 2:2008cv00656
Plaintiff:
William E. Stephenson
Defendant:
Ohio State University, National Institute of Health, U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Metz et al v. Unizan Bank et al
as 5:2005cv01510
Defendant:
Farmers National Bank, U.S. Bancorp., Meta Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Metz, Ferrel Brehold, Bernida Brehold and others
Not Yet Classified:
JoAnn Floyd, Richard Floyd, Marlene Blair and others
Cross Defendant:
Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Intervenor:
Murray Caldwell, Martha Glauber, Helen Alpanalp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
