Cases 51 - 60 of 1,567
Tysinger et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lawrence K. Tysinger and Michele Tysinger
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Resendez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02335
Plaintiff:
Angelo Resendez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sczygelski v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Sczygelski
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilken et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Jodi L. Wilken and Jeff Wilken
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yales et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02360
Plaintiff:
Martin Patrick Yales, Jr. and Sharon Ann Yales
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Olig et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02329
Plaintiff:
Candace R. Olig and James Olig
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Runkle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02344
Plaintiff:
Donald Runkle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payne v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02331
Plaintiff:
John B. Payne, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02334
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Perez and Yolanda Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richmond v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
Monique R. Richmond
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
