Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. B & H Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv13982
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
B & H Construction Company, Inc., Steven M Hardy and Rick J Blakley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. DNS Contracting, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv13970
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
DNS Contracting, Incorporated and David S. Spaw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Blue Water Framing & Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv13880
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Russell Plastering Co. et al
as 2:2010cv13862
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Russell Plastering Co. and Jack Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Detroit Interiors, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv13430
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Detroit Interiors, Inc., Leethel Neal, Lori Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Retail Finishes, Inc.
as 2:2010cv11500
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Retail Finishes, Inc. and Shawn Spishak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Beem Construction, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv10550
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit & Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Beem Construction, L.L.C. and Gary Beem
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Whitson Insulation Co. et al
as 5:2010cv10474
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Whitson Insulation Co., Whitson Insulation Co., Craig R Whitson and others
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. J.S. Vig Construction Co. et al
as 2:2010cv10266
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
J.S. Vig Construction Co., Joseph S. Vig and Valerie J Vig
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. GTB Interiors, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv14870
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
