Cases 1 - 10 of 16
James Zeas v. Jason Garnett
as 23-1767
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES J. ZEAS
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON GARNETT, Chief of Parole for the Illinois Department of Corrections
Richard Johnson v. Regional Chief
as 23-1053
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD A. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
REGIONAL CHIEF, Unit 517, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Probation and Parole
Jasper Frazier v. Christina Reagle
as 22-2980
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASPER FRAZIER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction
Daniel Schmidt v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 17-3641
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL K. SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, JON E. LITSCHER and WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Miguel Rivera v. John Baldwin
as 17-2013
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Miguel Rivera v. John Baldwin
as 17-1592
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Miguel Rivera v. John R. Baldwin
as 16-4031
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Scott Oberst v. Amy Ardikovic
as 16-3734
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT E. OBERST
Respondent - Appellee:
AMY ARDIKOVIC, Agent, Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Triandus Tabb v. Tim Christianson
as 16-1826
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRIANDUS TABB
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM CHRISTIANSON, Acting Chief of Parole, Illinois Department of Corrections
Andre Burkett v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 14-3235
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDRE BURKETT
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MILWAUKEE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
