Cases 71 - 80 of 809
Steven F. Helfand v. TikTok Inc.
as 22-2682
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLAINTIFFS' CO-LEAD COUNSEL and PLAINTIFFS' LIAISON COUNSEL
Appellant:
STEVEN F. HELFAND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENDANTS' LEAD COUNSEL
Defendant:
TIKTOK INC.
James Synnott v. Paul Burgermeister, et al
as 22-2447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SYNNOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL BURGERMEISTER and IAN NORTHRUP
Epic Systems Corporation v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited, et al
as 22-2420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED and TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, doing business as TCA America
Bobby Dickerson, Jr. v. Google, Inc., et al
as 21-3413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY L. DICKERSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE INCORPORATED, LARRY PAGE, SERGEY BRIN and others
Venequip, S.A. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 22-1463
Petitioner / Appellant:
VENEQUIP, S.A.
Respondent / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Dale Joswick v. Minnesota Repossessors Inc.
as 22-2442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE JOSWICK
Defendant / Appellee:
MINNESOTA REPOSSESSORS INC.
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LLC, et al
as 22-2430
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant / Appellant:
CONSUMER FIRST LEGAL GROUP, LLC, THOMAS G. MACEY, JEFFREY J. ALEMAN and others
Angela Nails v. McDonald's Restaurant, et al
as 22-2406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA NAILS
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF ILLINOIS, INCORPORATED and CHRISTOPHER KEMPCZINSKI
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LLC, et al
as 22-2503
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant / Appellant:
CONSUMER FIRST LEGAL GROUP, LLC, THOMAS G. MACEY, JEFFREY J. ALEMAN and others
Drive Now Auto Credit Co. Inc. v. Vincent Klock
as 22-2286
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DRIVE NOW AUTO CREDIT COMPANY, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
VINCENT KLOCK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
