Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Curtis Lovelace, et al v. Adam Gibson, et al
as 20-3254
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF QUINCY, ADAM GIBSON, Detective, JOHN SUMMERS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINCOLN LOVELACE, LOGAN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Curtis Lovelace, et al v. James Keller
as 20-3255
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES KELLER, Coroner
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINCOLN LOVELACE, LOGAN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Logan Lake v. McHenry County Court
as 20-2347
Petitioner:
LOGAN BRADLEY LAKE
Respondent:
MCHENRY COUNTY COURT
USA v. Logan Edwards
as 20-2286
Defendant / Appellant:
LOGAN EDWARDS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chris Logan v. City of Chicago, et al
as 20-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MAY, individually, DAVID SCHMIDT, individually, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Adam Gibson, et al v. Sue Myerscough
as 19-2342
Interested Party:
CURTIS LOVELACE, LINCOLN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Petitioner:
ADAM GIBSON, Detective, ROBERT COPLEY, Police Chief, JAMES KELLER, Coroner and others
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
Logan Owsley v. Mark Gorbett, et al
as 19-1825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOGAN A. OWSLEY, in his individual capacity and as Administrator of the ESTATE OF CARY OWSLEY,
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIE L. NUNEMAKER, WILLIAM R. KINMAN, JR., MARK E. GORBETT, in his individual and official capacities as Sheriff of Bartholomew County and others
Joe Logan, Sr. v. J.R. Bell
as 19-1588
Respondent / Appellee:
J.R. BELL, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOE A. LOGAN, SR.
Albert Johnson v. Glen Austin, et al
as 19-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT L. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PRISONER REVIEW BOARD SUPERVISOR, JUDY OAKLEY, Parole Agent, MARK SCHAFER, Champaign County Parole Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
