Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Nandorf, Inc., et al v. Applied Underwriters Captive R
as 19-3090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ALTERMAN, NANDORF, INC., doing business as UNIQUE THRIFT STORE and SOUTHWEST MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLIED UNDERWRITERS CAPTIVE RISK ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Restoration Risk Retention Gro v. Dave Ross, et al
as 17-1016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RESTORATION RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE ROSS, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services and TRADES CREDENTIALING UNIT, Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services
Restoration Risk Retention Gro v. Dave Ross, et al
as 16-4069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RESTORATION RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE ROSS, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services and TRADES CREDENTIALING UNIT, Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services
Robert Lodholtz, et al v. Granite State Insurance Compa, et al
as 14-8015
Petitioner:
ROBERT LODHOLTZ and PULLLIAM ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INCORPORATED
Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al
as 12-8015
Petitioner:
HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and AON RISK INSURANCE SERVICES INCORPORATED, a California corporation
Star Insurance Company, et al v. Risk Marketing Group Incorpora, et al
as 08-1377
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation, WILLIAMSBURG NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation and AMERICAN INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, a Bermuda Corporation
Not Party - Appellant:
CHARLES E. STEVENSON, DON A. MOORE and ENCOMPASS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
RISK MARKETING GROUP INCORPORATED, an Illinois Corporation and CEBCOR SERVICE CORPORATION, an Illinois Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
