Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Eric Brant, et al v. William C. Griesbach
as 24-1161
Petitioner:
ERIC R. BRANT, THOMAS CAMPBELL and BRIAN MINOR
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH
Interested Party:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL INC., SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS INC., SCHNEIDER FINANCE INC. and others
Steven F. Helfand v. TikTok Inc.
as 22-2682
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLAINTIFFS' CO-LEAD COUNSEL and PLAINTIFFS' LIAISON COUNSEL
Appellant:
STEVEN F. HELFAND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEFENDANTS' LEAD COUNSEL
Defendant:
TIKTOK INC.
Driftless Area Land Conservancy, et al v. Rural Utilities Service, et al
as 22-1737
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DRIFTLESS AREA LAND CONSERVANCY, WISCONSIN WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, CHRISTOPHER MCLEAN, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Defendant:
DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE, ITC MIDWEST LLC and AMERICAN TRANSMISSION COMPANY LLC
Driftless Area Land Conservancy, et al v. Rural Utilities Service, et al
as 22-1709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DRIFTLESS AREA LAND CONSERVANCY, WISCONSIN WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, CHRISTOPHER MCLEAN, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
AMERICAN TRANSMISSION COMPANY LLC, DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE and ITC MIDWEST LLC
Felipe Gomez v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, LORI LIGHTFOOT, as Mayor, and personally, STATE OF TEXAS, Interpleader defendant and others
National Wildlife Refuge Association, et al v. American Transmission Company LLC, et al
as 22-1347
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DRIFTLESS AREA LAND CONSERVANCY, WISCONSIN WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN TRANSMISSION COMPANY LLC, by its corporate manager ATC MANAGEMENT INC., ITC MIDWEST LLC and DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE
Defendant:
RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CLEAN POWER ASSOCIATION, CLEAN GRID ALLIANCE, MIDCONTINENT INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR, INC. and others
Driftless Area Land Conservanc, et al v. American Transmission Company, et al
as 21-3123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DRIFTLESS AREA LAND CONSERVANCY, WISCONSIN WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN TRANSMISSION COMPANY LLC, by its corporate manager ATC MANAGEMENT INC., ITC MIDWEST LLC and DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al v. Theodore Rokita, et al
as 21-2573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ALL-OPTIONS, INC. and JEFFREY GLAZER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE E. ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, in his official capacity, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, in her official capacity, JOHN STROBEL, M.D., President of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al v. Todd Rokita, et al
as 21-2480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ALL-OPTIONS, INC. and JEFFREY GLAZER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE E. ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, in his official capacity, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, in her official capacity, JOHN STROBEL, M.D., President of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Eric Brant v. Schneider National Inc., et al
as 21-2122
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS INC., SCHNEIDER FINANCE INC., SCHNEIDER NATIONAL INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC R. BRANT
Appellant:
AIMEE HENERY, ERIC ALEXANDER, JOSHUA ARRINGTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
