Cases 31 - 40 of 363
Trustees of Sheet Metal Worker, et al v. Rogers Mechanical, Inc.
as 21-2137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 20, INDIANAPOLIS AREA, PENSION TRUST and TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 20 WELFARE AND BENEFIT FUND
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGERS MECHANICAL, INC.
Peter Gakuba v. David Rains, et al
as 21-1864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE NEESE, ROGER MOSS and DAVID RAINS, Warden
Rebekah Atkins v. Roger A. G. Sharpe, et al
as 21-1831
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER A. G. SHARPE, Clerk, HARRIETT SYMMES HARMAN, MICHELLE IMEL, Deputy Clerk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Thomas Willan, et al v. Dane County, et al
as 21-1617
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER LANE, DANE COUNTY, SARAH JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA A. WILLAN, THOMAS WILLAN and THOMAS M. WILLAN
Patricia Breckenridge v. Roger Goodell
as 21-1618
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER GOODELL, NFL Commissioner
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE and PATRICIA ANN BRECKENRIDGE
USA v. Amariea Rogers
as 21-1564
Defendant / Appellant:
AMARIEA ROGERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roger Day, Jr. v. James P. Hanlon
as 21-1164
Petitioner:
ROGER C. DAY, JR.
Respondent:
JAMES P. HANLON
Robert Donley v. Jeffrey Hart, et al
as 20-3498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT V. DONLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE KETTLECAMP, JEFFREY HART and ROGER LANDON
Dexter Rogers v. Holly A. Brady
as 20-3502
Interested Party:
MICHAEL J. PACKNETT, CEO Parkview, JASON A. SCHEELE, Attorney, CRAIG J. BOBAY, Chief Judge and others
Respondent:
HOLLY A. BRADY
Petitioner:
DEXTER ROGERS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Carrie Bell Rogers, Estate of Premius Rogers
Eric Bernard v. Roger Scott, et al
as 20-3453
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIN MCROBERTS, JOYCE KLEIN, KELLY KING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC E. BERNARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
