Cases 51 - 60 of 222
Jane Doe 1, et al v. NorthShore University HealthSy
as 21-3242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM
Charles Robinson v. Jane Doe, et al
as 21-3229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MOHAMED ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, Nurse, DIXON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, LARRY J. WILKS and others
Billy Tyler v. Barb Bocik, et al
as 21-2900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLY TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
BARB BOCIK and JANE DOE
Delorean Bryson v. Michael Rowe, et al
as 21-2768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELOREAN L. BRYSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ROWE, G4S, SERGEANT BARBER and others
Jerry Ezebuiroh v. Kenny Benzing, et al
as 21-2503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY B. EZEBUIROH
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNY BENZING, Jail Administrator, ALLISON ALEXANDER, Nurse, RICH STEVENSON, Sheriff and others
Javier Montanez v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 21-2490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER MONTANEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MALDANDO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAWKINS and others
Apple Inc. v. Roslyn Hazlitt, et al
as 21-8019
Respondent:
ROSLYN HAZLITT, RICHARD ROBINSON, YOLANDA BROWN and others
Petitioner:
APPLE INC.
Jerome Walker v. Correctional Officer Leibert, et al
as 20-3487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUDIE, JANE DOE, Nurse, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEIBERT and others
Patrick Delices v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3493
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY SOMMERS, Associate Proffessor and former Advisor in his official and individual capacities, JOHANNES BRITZ, Chief Academic Officer/Provost in his official and individual capacities, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK DELICES
Apple Inc. v. Roslyn Hazlitt, et al
as 20-8033
Respondent:
ROSLYN HAZLITT, RICHARD ROBINSON, YOLANDA BROWN and others
Petitioner:
APPLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
