Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Don Lippert, et al v. Quentin Tanner, et al
as 24-1998
Plaintiff:
DON LIPPERT, WILLIAM E. BASSETT, MILAM MARTIN and others
Defendant:
QUENTIN TANNER, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
USA v. Fernando Godinez
as 22-2195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FERNANDO GODINEZ
James Courtney v. Kimberly Butler, et al
as 21-2697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES COURTNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY BUTLER, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ and others
USA v. Adan Godinez
as 21-2211
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAN GODINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Adan Godinez
as 21-2178
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAN GODINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 20-2924
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE DACE
Ralph Holmes, et al v. Salvador Godinez
as 20-2709
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE CHILDRESS, HANNIBAL EASON, BILLY JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
Ralph Holmes, et al v. Salvador Godinez
as 20-2236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE CHILDRESS, HANNIBAL EASON, BILLY JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Acting Director of Illinois Department of Corrections
James Wright, Jr. v. Kimberly Butler, et al
as 20-1926
Defendant / Appellee:
MINH T. SCOTT, Chairman of the Adjustment Committee, REBECCA COWAN, Member of the Adjustment Committee, KIMBERLY BUTLER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. WRIGHT, JR.
Richard Bilik v. Robert Shearing, et al
as 20-1323
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MOLDENHAUER, ROBERT SHEARING, Doctor, JOHN TROST, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD BILIK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
