Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BAGLEY v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00812
Plaintiff:
ANDREA BAGLEY
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc. and ETHICON INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al.
as 1:2014cv03261
Plaintiff:
Edward Johnson and Margaret Johnson
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glosson et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02677
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. Glosson and Ronald M. Glosson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cosat v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04781
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cosat
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malicki et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul Malicki and Elizabeth Malicki
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02939
Plaintiff:
Cindy Hutson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01537
Plaintiff:
William West
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01523
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Williams and Carol Williams
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Alza Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv05409
Plaintiff:
Anna Chapman
Defendant:
Alza Corporation , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
