Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Ewing v. Stevens et al
as 1:2016cv10814
Plaintiff: DeMarreo Ewing
Defendant: Stevens, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. City of Chicago
as 1:2016cv10768
Plaintiff: Ardamis Darrell Sims
Defendant: John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McGee v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv07847
Plaintiff: Ricky McGee
Defendant: City Of Chicago, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harkins v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv05459
Plaintiff: William B. Harkins
Defendant: John Doe, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wanke v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2016cv50101
Plaintiff: Richard Wanke
Defendant: City Of Rockford, County of Winnebago, Illinois, IL Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odie, Jr. v. Chino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv50043
Plaintiff: Silas B. Odie, Jr.
Defendant: Angel Chino, Art Chicon, Dan Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCree v. Karim et al
as 1:2015cv10570
Plaintiff: Rafael McCree
Defendant: Fatima Karim, Thomas M. Giusto, Stacie E. Kepmton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Emanual et al
as 1:2015cv08521
Plaintiff: Daniel Woods
Defendant: Mayor Rahn Emanual, Garry McCathy, Detective Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Chicago Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv07702
Plaintiff: Charles Allen
Defendant: Kentasa Martin, Jane & John Does 1-7 and Garry McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Mercy Hospital et al
as 1:2015cv05728
Plaintiff: Emile Brown
Defendant: Mercy Hospital, Chicago Police Dept, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?