Cases 41 - 50 of 186
Saint Lawrence Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05549
Plaintiff:
Saint Lawrence Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC and Cellco Partnership
Respondent:
James Ashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jesus Escamilla, Jr. vs. Global Tower, LLC, et al.
as 1:2016cv10364
Plaintiff:
Jesus Escamilla, Jr.
Defendant:
Nexius Solutions Inc, Nexius Insight Inc, AT&T Mobility Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martinez et al v. T-Mobile, Limited et al
as 1:2016cv07020
Defendant:
T-Mobile, Limited , Wireless Vision, St, Louis, LLC , Wireless Vision Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Martinez and Raquel Saucedo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massey v. Metro PCS T-Mobile Network Cell Phone Service Corporate Office
as 1:2015cv11882
Plaintiff:
Maurice Massey
Defendant:
Metro PCS T-Mobile Network Cell Phone Service Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chelmowski v. AT&T MOBILITY L.L.C.
as 1:2015cv10980
Plaintiff:
James Chelmowski
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Experian North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08771
Plaintiff:
Brendan Moore and Matthew DeVitto
Defendant:
Experian North America, Inc. and T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
