Cases 31 - 40 of 391
People of The State Of Illinois v. Garrett et al
as 1:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois
Defendant:
Deshawn Garrett
Respondent:
ATF Special Agent Craig Fries, Assist. U.S. Atty. Scott Edenfield, Craig Fries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CDL 1000, INC., an Illinois corporation v. Robertson
as 1:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
CDL 1000, INC., an Illinois corporation
Defendant:
Scott Robertson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Mackey v. PeopleConnect, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Scott Mackey, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Scott Mackey
Defendant:
PeopleConnect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Romero v. Arnold Scott Harris P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv06153
Plaintiff:
Sean Romero
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris P.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
National Interstate Insurance Company v. Malcom et al
as 2:2021cv02234
Petitioner:
National Interstate Insurance Company
Respondent:
The Estate of Peggy J Malcom, The Estate of Bradley E Malcom, Clayton M Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Reynolds v. Scott Credit Union
as 3:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Paula Reynolds
Defendant:
Scott Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Svanda et al v. Jackson County et al
as 3:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jason Svanda, Clifton E. Basden, Dan Bost and others
Defendant:
Jackson County, C.J. Calandro, Richard E Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
