Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rowe Marketing, LLC v. Kaz USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Rowe Marketing, LLC
Defendant:
Kaz USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santander Bank, N.A. v. New City Historic Auto Row LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
New City Historic Auto Row LLC and Michael S Helmstetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santander Bank, N.A. v. New City Historic Auto Row LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06861
Plaintiff:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
New City Historic Auto Row LLC, Imagine Cars LLC, Imagine Motorcycles LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board of Trustees, University of Illinois College of Medicine et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois at Chicago , College Committee on Student Promotions, Peoria Committee on Student Promotions and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Ahmad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Printers Row, LLC v. FGS Realty Advisors, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06534
Plaintiff:
Printers Row, LLC
Defendant:
FGS Realty Advisors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
-BGC Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc v. Oakview Construction Inc
as 1:2010cv01384
Plaintiff:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Defendant:
Oakview Construction Inc
Thirdparty_defendant:
Rowe Construction Co and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Oakview Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al
as 1:2006cv05486
Plaintiff:
David Grochocinski, David Grochocinski and David Grochocinski
Defendant:
Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
