Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Harrington v. United States Parcel Service et al
as 1:2020cv05303
Defendant:
United States Parcel Service, Robert Duncan and Louis Dejoy
Plaintiff:
April Harrington
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Chambers v. Rodham Clinton et al
as 1:2016cv10408
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Chambers
Defendant:
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, Timothy Tim Kaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv09845
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
United States of America , Paul Ryan , Mitch McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Segovia et al v. Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv10196
Plaintiff:
Luis Segovia , Jose Antonio Torres , Pamela Lynn Colon and others
Defendant:
Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago , Langdon D. Neal , Karen Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv02997
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The State of Illinois , The Illinois Board of Elections and Steven Sandvoss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
State Of Illinois , Illinois State Board of Elections and Rupert T. Borgsmiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Roy v. Obama et al
as 4:2009cv04031
Plaintiff:
Kamel K Roy
Defendant:
Barack Obama, John McCain, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. County of Kane, Illinois et al
as 1:2007cv05451
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
County of Kane, Illinois and John Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
