Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Simpson, Willie v. Ericksen, Peter, et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Simpson
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch , CYNTHIA THORPE , Janel Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tessen v. HELGERSON et al
as 3:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Tessen
Defendant:
STEVE HELGERSON, NANCY HAHNISCH, Darci Burreson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARION v. Nickel et al
as 3:2009cv00723
Plaintiff:
War N. Marion
Defendant:
Janel Nickel, Dylon Radtke, Chad Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Huibregtse et al
as 3:2009cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jackie Carter
Defendant:
Peter Huibregtse, Monica Horner, JUDITH HUIBREGTSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Suliene et al
as 3:2009cv00252
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Simpson
Defendant:
Dalia Suliene, Lori Alsum, CYNTHIA THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Nickel et al
as 3:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
Janel Nickel, CAPTAIN RADTKE, Lt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKinnie v. Heisz et al
as 3:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Janari McKinnie
Defendant:
Mark Heisz, Brad Wolfgram, Al Morris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cain v. Grams et al
as 3:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Stefan Cain
Defendant:
Greg Grams, Janel Nickel and Dylon Radtke
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Golden v. Nickel et al
as 3:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Parish Golden
Defendant:
Janel Nickel, Greg Grams, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
Anthony H. Turner
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Columbia Correctional Officials, GREGORY GRAM and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
