Cases 81 - 90 of 379
Wilkerson v. Fenoglio et al
as 3:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
David Wilkerson
Defendant:
James Fenoglio, Lee Ryker, Mr. Hurford, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner-El v. Taylor et al
as 1:2011cv01103
Plaintiff:
James G Turner-El
Defendant:
Gladys Taylor, Michael Randall, Roger Walker Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cockrell et al v. Shaw et al
as 1:2011cv01471
Plaintiff:
Anita Cockrell
Defendant:
Frank Shaw , Shaun Bass , Cynthia Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC
as 3:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker Jr, Michael P Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Walker et al
as 3:2011cv03057
Plaintiff:
Elmer E Thomas
Defendant:
Roger Walker, Gladyse C Taylor, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC
as 1:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker Jr, Michael P Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Miller et al
as 3:2011cv03039
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
Jackie Miller, Terri Anderson, Gregory P Firkus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Big Muddy River Correctional Center et al
as 3:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Charles E Bramlett
Defendant:
Big Muddy River Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Corrections, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boclair v. IDOC et al
as 3:2010cv01008
Plaintiff:
Stanley Boclair
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker, Jr, Donald Hulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boclair v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00978
Plaintiff:
Stanley Boclair
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Roger Walker, Jr, Donald Hulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
