Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. DeKalb County et al
as 3:2024cv50135
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Grant Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Grant Mason
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, S Rodriguez, Daorerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Pocewicz et al
as 1:2021cv00636
Defendant:
Brent Pocewicz, Will County, Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Hughes et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Michael D Hughes, Donald M McLaurin, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maboneza v. Henry et al
as 2:2019cv02115
Defendant:
Danville Correctional Center, Thierry Henry, . Unknown Persons and others
Plaintiff:
Yves M Maboneza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathison v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01173
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Mathison
Defendant:
United States of America, Joshua I Grant, Marty McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muren v. Chicago Tribune et al
as 1:2018cv01477
Plaintiff:
Grant Van Muren
Defendant:
Naperville Sun, Clifford Ward, Chicago Tribune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirchner v. Wolfe et al
as 4:2017cv04310
Plaintiff:
Michael William Kirchner
Defendant:
Keith . Wolfe, Mark Grant, Desirae Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
