Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Tersip v. Walgreens
as 1:2018cv02493
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Tersip
Defendant:
Walgreens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Kolinek, et al v. Walgreen Company
as 15-3853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KOLINEK, individually and on hebalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant:
PAMELA SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREEN COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation
Robert Kolinek, et al v. Walgreen Company
as 15-3857
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KOLINEK, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Appellant:
GARY W. SIBLEY and PAIGE NASH
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREEN COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation
Robert Kolinek, et al v. Walgreen Company
as 15-3842
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KOLINEK, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Appellant:
GLEITH COZBY and RENDEE BULLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREEN COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation
Robert Kolinek, et al v. Walgreen Company
as 15-3786
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KOLINEK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant:
MELINDA E. FRANZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREEN COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation
Robert Kolinek, et al v. Walgreen Company
as 15-3757
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KOLINEK, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Appellant:
LYNDY STREIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREEN COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation
Henderson v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2015cv05723
Plaintiff:
Don Henderson
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De La Torre et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2015cv05075
Plaintiff:
Paul De La Torre and Joshua Ogden
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re:
Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
