Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Sey et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Sey and Debora L. Sey
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Davis et al v. Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Diane Davis and John Everett Davis
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McCloskey et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Denise McCloskey and Dennis McCloskey
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cortez Castro v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Cortez Castro
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Schenck v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00692
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LISA WARD SCHENCK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smith v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Demontrond RV Conroe, LLC and Thor Motor Coach Inc
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Smith
Pretrial Service:
Michael Scopelitis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Watson et al v. Thor Motor Coach
as 3:2024cv00485
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Watson and Mark D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Baierlein v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Tanya Baierlein
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Clarence Martin, et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE MARTIN and TERRI MARTIN
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC.
Clarence Martin, et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 24-1553
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE MARTIN and TERRI MARTIN
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
