Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 118
EnchantedMob, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv15688
Plaintiff: EnchantedMob, Inc. and Mob Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Suzhou Xinjiayuan Home Textile Co., Ltd., Yiwu City Lvcheng E-Commerce Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gulan v The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint
as 1:2023cv15435
Plaintiff: Liao Gulan and Gulan Liao
Defendant: THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A TO THE COMPLAINT, Aisite-US, BIXKO TECHNIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
AJ's Nifty Products v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on the Attached Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14200
Plaintiff: AJ's Nifty Products
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on the Attached Schedule A, XBagSJ, YSCEN and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv13941
Plaintiff: BBC Studios Distribution Ltd
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Bad bad girl, Boom Party Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Spin Master Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05855
Plaintiff: Spin Master Ltd. and Spin Master Toys UK Limited
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A3QG4GFKU46UH7, CGR Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04498
Plaintiff: Nike, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Guangzhou Daxin Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd., Henan Huaying Shoes Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jonas Sebastian Jodicke v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04429
Plaintiff: Jonas Sebastian Jodicke
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, chenshenghaodianpu, FOR.AMIMI and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Nirvana, L.L.C. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04080
Plaintiff: Nirvana, L.L.C.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Xiamen Fengway Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., Xiamen Sky Pigeon Network Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Marc Jacobs Trademarks, LLC et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03701
Plaintiff: Marc Jacobs Trademarks, LLC and Marc Jacobs International, LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, LiYongBo BoYong, LokiOdinson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
GS Holistic LLC v. Tobacco & Vape LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff: GS Holistic, LLC and GS Holistic LLC
Defendant: TOBACCO & VAPE LLC doing business as TOBACCO & VAPE, DIAN Y JIANG and Dian Yong Jiang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?