Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Oakley, Inc. v. Yiyi, et al
as 1:2015cv05963
Defendant:
Tehmina, Davis, Tentxung Youxian Gongsi and others
Plaintiff:
Chhavi, Patel, Mary and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2014cv09903
Plaintiff:
Michael Kors, L.L.C.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Fengyi Zhang, Hua Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Flava Works, Inc. v. Latavius Robinson
as 1:2012cv05086
Defendant:
Latavius Robinson
Plaintiff:
Flava Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Coach, Inc. et al v. Kane County Flea Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06148
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kane County Flea Market, Inc. , Frederick Robinson , Armila Santarromana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Flava Works, Inc. v. bonic et al
as 1:2011cv05100
Plaintiff:
Flava Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Anton Bonic, Cormelian Brown, Anton Ejikeme and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Sellstrom Manufacturing Company v. Techniweld Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv02011
Plaintiff:
Sellstrom Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Techniweld Corporation, Robinson Technical Southeast, Inc. and Techniweld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Phoenix International Inc v. Robinson Technical Southeast Inc
as 2:2008cv00709
Plaintiff:
Phoenix International Inc and Phoenix International Inc
Defendant:
Robinson Technical Southeast Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
World Kitchen, LLC et al v. Robinson Home Productts, Inc
as 1:2007cv02644
Plaintiff:
World Kitchen, LLC, Corning Incorporated and Corning Incorporated
Defendant:
Robinson Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
