Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Levi Strauss & Co. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04451
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", GotoLoveBoy Store, Modish Frontier Store and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bulgari, S.p.A. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2017cv07007
Plaintiff:
Bulgari, S.p.A.
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Wen Jie Xu, Zhao Dequn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe, et al
as 14-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCY M. NERI
Defendant - Appellee:
MELINDA MONROE, STEVEN LARSON, ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ARTS, INCORPORATED and others
Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe, et al
as 13-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCY M. NERI
Defendant - Appellee:
MELINDA MONROE, STEVEN LARSON, ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ARTS, INCORPORATED and others
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Sound of the Times Entertainment et al
as 1:2013cv03260
Defendant:
Sound of the Times Entertainment, Terrence Palmer, Leanne Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Quincy Neri v. Melinda Monroe, et al
as 12-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCY M. NERI
Defendant - Appellee:
MELINDA MONROE, LESLEY SAGER, ERIC FERGUSON and others
Neri, Quincy v. Pinckney Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Quincy M. Neri
Defendant:
Pinckney Holdings, LLC, Linda Hughes, John Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Neri, Quincy v. Monroe, Melinda et al
as 3:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Quincy M. Neri
Defendant:
Melinda Monroe, Steven Larson, Architectural Building Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
