Cases 11 - 20 of 261
USA v. Miguel Rodriguez, Jr.
as 23-1522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL A. RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Rodriguez v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing of New England, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Martin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fair Collections & Outsourcing of New England, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rodriguez et al v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06185
Plaintiff:
Mirna Rodriguez and Oscar Sanchez
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Francisco Vazquez-Rodriguez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 22-2997
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO VAZQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Carlos L. Rodriguez
as 22-2967
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS L. RODRIGUEZ
Nolla v. Rodriguez Vargas
as 2:2022cv01224
Petitioner:
Jorge Isael Nolla
Respondent:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
Rosa Albina Rodriguez Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garnishee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez v. Lister et al
as 2:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
WILSON RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Cody Lister, Lynette Lister, Jeff Lister and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Apple Recovery Services Corp.
as 1:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
Vivian Rodriguez-Diaz
Defendant:
Apple Recovery Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
