Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Tado v. TikTok, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Melanie Tado
Defendant:
TikTok, Inc., a California corporation and ByteDance, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Murphy v. TikTok, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Katie Murphy
Defendant:
TikTok, Inc. and ByteDance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Bravo v. TIKTOK, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Anibeth Bravo
Defendant:
TIKTOK, INC. and ByteDance Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Smith et al v. TikTok Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Cinnamon Smith, Alison Paige, Marrchelle Tanzymore and others
Defendant:
TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Rahn v. TikTok, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07256
Plaintiff:
Nate Rahn
Defendant:
TikTok, Inc. and ByteDance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
G. R. v. TikTok Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05212
Defendant:
ByteDance Inc. and TikTok Inc.
Plaintiff:
G. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2020cv04699
In Re:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Aparna Iyer, M.P., a minor, by and through her guardian, Requeenis Gilder, N.D. Cal. Actions Interim Lead Counsel and others
Defendant:
BEIJING BYTEDANCE TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD, MUSICAL.LY, TikTok Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Meghan Smith, Loevy & Loevy, Edelson PC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
