Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bellissimo v. BVAA Compass Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06833
Defendant:
BVAA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and Compass Bank
Plaintiff:
Lara Bellissimo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Margaritaville Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Margaritaville Lounge, LLC, Jennifer Almeida-Sandoval, Victor Tello Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1983
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Margaritaville Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00779
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Margaritaville Lounge, LLC, Jennifer Almeida-Sandoval, Victor Tello Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Miguel Lara-Unzueta v. J. C. Holland
as 15-1165
Petitioner:
MIGUEL LARA-UNZUETA
Respondent:
J. C. HOLLAND, Warden
Party-in-Interest:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Gerardo Hernandez Lara v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-3305
Petitioner:
GERARDO HERNANDEZ LARA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
National Auto Parts, Inc. v. Automart Nationwide, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08160
Plaintiff:
National Auto Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Automart Nationwide, Inc. , Mohammad Anjum , Cheng Roger Lo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
