Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Zivanovic et al v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv05695
Plaintiff:
Biljana Zivanovic and Ivan Saric
Defendant:
Elaine Duke and Martha Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Kevryn Gaines-Duke
as 17-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVRYN GAINES-DUKES, also known as MARQUIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 16-1585
Petitioner:
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC.
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Joshua Howard, et al v. William Pollard, et al
as 15-8025
Petitioner:
JOSHUA HOWARD, WILLIAM E. WESO, JARVIS DUKE and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM POLLARD, SCOTT WALKER, EDWARD WALL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 14-2153
Petitioner:
MISO TRANSMISSION OWNERS
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervening Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION COMPANY, doing business as ITC TRANSMISSION, MICHIGAN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC, ITC MIDWEST LLC and others
National Wildlife Federation et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
National Wildlife Federation , Prairie Rivers Network , Missouri Coalition for the Environment and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick and Duke Deluca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
