Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Samuel Stokes v. Supervisor Thatcher, et al
as 21-1253
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT BALL, OFFICER ZICK, Correctional Officer, SUPERVISOR THATCHER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL WALTER STOKES
Curtis Lovelace, et al v. Adam Gibson, et al
as 20-3254
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF QUINCY, ADAM GIBSON, Detective, JOHN SUMMERS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINCOLN LOVELACE, LOGAN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Samuel Stokes v. Lieutenant Williams, et al
as 20-3020
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK HENDRIX, Mr., Sup Grievance, SERGEANT GORDON, Mrs., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER EDWARDS, Mrs. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL WALTER STOKES
Dequarius Fitzpatrick v. Chad Nys
as 20-3004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEQUARIUS D. FITZPATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD NYS, Sergeant
Jermaine Hampton v. James Muenchow, et al
as 20-3159
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES MUENCHOW, T. MOON, Sergeant and YANA POSICH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE A. HAMPTON
Rayvon Parker v. City of Chicago, et al
as 20-3007
Defendant / Appellee:
GUADALUPE CUEVAS, CITY OF CHICAGO, SHAUN MENAGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON PARKER
Stanley Wrice v. Peter Dignan, et al
as 20-3081
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BYRNE, former Chicago Police Sergeant, PETER DIGNAN, former Chicago Police Detective and CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY WRICE
Stanley Wrice v. John Byrne, et al
as 20-2997
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BYRNE, former Chicago Police Sergeant, PETER DIGNAN, former Chicago Police Detective and CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STANLEY WRICE
Richard Everett v. Indiana Department of Correcti, et al
as 20-2976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD EVERETT
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT TRIM and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Kennado Taylor v. Ms. Corey, et al
as 20-2671
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT MILLER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KIEVLES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JEFFROD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNADO K. TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
