Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stansell et al v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia et al
as 1:2015cv06826
Plaintiff:
Keith Stansell , Marc Gonsalves , Thomas Howes and others
Defendant:
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, Juvenal Ovidio Ricardo Palmera Pineda, Anayibe Rojas Valderrama and others
Claimant:
Mercurio International S.A. , Bauza, Inc. , Jose Ricaurte Diaz Herrera and others
Garnishee:
Interaudi Bank, BNP Paribas, Santandar Chartered Bank and others
Intervenor:
HS AD, Inc.
Movant:
USA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Eddi Ramirez v. James E. Shadid
as 15-2388
Petitioner:
EDDI RAMIREZ
Respondent:
JAMES E. SHADID
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armando Pioquinto-Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 15-1656
Petitioner:
ARMANDO PIOQUINTO-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Hector Ramirez
as 14-3666
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HECTOR RAMIREZ, also known as TANO
Raul Plaza-Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-2828
Petitioner:
RAUL PLAZA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Luis Ramirez-Padilla
as 14-2778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS RAMIREZ-PADILLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
